Independent Design Review Governance Review

Make your design review arrangements easier to trust.

An evidence-led review of independence, oversight, conflicts, transparency and reporting - with a clear record of strengths, material gaps and practical priorities.

A national, model-neutral service available across England.

Need independent assurance? Book a short scoping call or telephone 01395 265768.

Standard Governance Review

£4,750 + VAT

Fixed fee for a defined standard scope

  • One legal entity and one review arrangement
  • Up to 12 core documents or 250 pages
  • 75-minute evidence meeting
  • Concise 12-18 page findings report
  • 45-minute senior read-out
  • One factual-correction round

Target issue within 15 working days of complete evidence and payment.

Book a 20-minute scoping call
Evidence-ledModel-neutralProportionateNon-statutoryNo accreditation

This service is provided by Design Review Ltd, the company behind The Design Review Panel. That relationship is disclosed as relevant provenance; the service is model-neutral and available to organisations using any provider or an internal arrangement.

Read the independence safeguards

Start without a sales call

See your exposure first. Decide what response is proportionate.

Free 10-question Exposure CheckPrivate in your browser · under five minutes · no email required

Three levels of support

Choose the level of assurance your decision needs.

Start with an evidence-led self-review, commission the defined independent review, or add wider evidence and senior assurance for a complex or higher-risk arrangement.

Recommended first step

Governance Health Check

£500 + VAT

A highly guided online assessment for teams that want to test one arrangement and turn the evidence into a credible action plan.

  • Private workspace with saved progress
  • 25-item evidence register and critical safeguards
  • 60 evidence-capped governance controls
  • Live risk picture and downloadable 90-day plan

No independent opinion, report or assurance.

Start the Health Check

Wider assurance

Enhanced Assurance Review

£13,500 + VAT

For shared, sensitive, high-profile or multi-party arrangements that need broader evidence and stronger senior assurance.

  • Lead reviewer plus independent peer reviewer
  • Up to six stakeholder evidence conversations
  • Expanded findings and 90-day action plan
  • Facilitated senior workshop and follow-up review

Final scope is confirmed before appointment.

Ready to proceed? Request a review date ↗Read the full published scope →

The online Health Check does not require an appointment. For the Standard and Enhanced reviews, Acuity records the requested appointment immediately; a draft invoice is prepared in Xero for our check and then emailed to the billing contact. No card details are needed. The requested review date must be at least 21 calendar days ahead and remains provisional until the conflicts check is complete and cleared funds are received at least 14 calendar days before the evidence meeting.

Put the findings into practice

Editable governance documents, built around the same framework.

The Model Documents Pack provides ten adaptable templates for one organisation and one named arrangement. It is £450 + VAT on its own, or £850 + VAT when bundled with the Governance Health Check.

Why this matters

Good people are not a substitute for visible governance.

Design review arrangements often develop over time. Responsibilities shift, operating relationships become familiar and important safeguards may be understood informally rather than evidenced clearly.

The Governance Review provides an independent, proportionate examination of the framework behind the panel - without treating one delivery model as inherently superior.

Who it is for

For organisations that commission, oversee or operate design review.

Local authorities

Review an established panel, shared service or commissioned arrangement.

Public bodies

Evidence transparent oversight where design review supports public decision-making.

Panel operators

Test whether documented controls match day-to-day practice.

Housing and development organisations

Strengthen governance around internal, external or partnership review.

When to commission

Useful before a governance question becomes a confidence problem.

When setting up a new design review arrangement.

Before re-procuring, renewing or extending a panel contract.

Following a challenge to impartiality by an applicant, objector or member.

In response to an internal-audit, scrutiny or monitoring-officer query.

Before a contested major scheme attracts press or legal attention.

When a periodic governance review falls due.

Review scope

Ten connected domains. One coherent evidence trail.

Every product uses the Design Review Governance Framework (v1.0), informed by the free, open-source Design Review Code of Conduct ↗and tailored to the organisation's chosen operating model.

01

Mandate, purpose and accountability

A defensible arrangement needs a clear public purpose, remit, owner and relationship to decision making.

02

Independence, funding and separation

Independence must be visible in structures, incentives and the control of advice—not merely asserted.

03

Conflicts, interests and conduct

Recorded identification and mitigation of actual, potential and perceived conflicts protects trust in the advice.

04

Commissioning, contracting and financial controls

Public bodies need an authorised, aligned and reviewable basis for commissioning and funding the arrangement.

05

Panel recruitment, composition and competence

The quality and legitimacy of advice depend on fair appointment, relevant expertise, diversity and continuing competence.

06

Scheme and panel selection, timing and proportionality

Reviews add most value when the right schemes, people, format and timing are selected for recorded reasons.

07

Preparation, evidence and participation

Balanced briefing, clear roles and accessible participation allow a panel to understand context without compromising independence.

08

Review conduct, advice and reporting

A consistent chaired process and protected reporting route turn multidisciplinary discussion into useful, traceable advice.

09

Transparency, confidentiality, records, data and AI

Public accountability depends on proportionate openness, lawful information handling and reliable records of how advice was produced.

10

Accountability, quality, outcomes and improvement

Feedback, complaints, sample testing and performance review show whether the arrangement works and improves over time.

What you receive

A practical report, not a generic checklist.

Findings distinguish what is evidenced from what may merit further review. They explain why each point matters and identify proportionate next actions.

Evidence mapWhat was reviewed and how it supports the arrangement.
StrengthsControls and practices that are clear and defensible.
Material gapsAreas where documentation, responsibility or practice is unclear.
PrioritiesProportionate actions, ordered by practical significance.
View a fictional specimen report ↗See the format, evidence language and prioritisation before commissioning.

How it works

A contained review with a clear beginning and end.

  1. 01

    Scope

    A short call confirms the organisation, arrangement, evidence base and any conflicts.

  2. 02

    Evidence

    Core documents are provided through an agreed secure route and checked for completeness.

  3. 03

    Meeting

    A focused evidence meeting tests how the documented controls operate in practice.

  4. 04

    Report

    A concise report records the evidence, strengths, material gaps and proportionate priorities.

  5. 05

    Read-out

    Senior stakeholders receive a practical briefing and one factual-correction opportunity.

Private self-check

Which areas can you evidence today?

Tick each statement you can support with current documents and practice. Nothing is submitted or stored. This is not a score, certificate or finding.

Carry the areas you have not ticked into a callback request so the first conversation is focused.

Who undertakes the review

Experienced leadership, matched to the assignment.

Each review is led by Jonathan Braddick, Tim Burton or Andy Robbins. The lead is selected for relevant experience, availability and the outcome of an assignment-specific conflicts check.

Independence safeguards

The offer is deliberately bounded.

No badge, compliance mark or permanent approved status.

No implication that another provider or delivery model is inferior.

Relevant common ownership and commercial interests are disclosed.

Design Review Ltd does not enter framework agreements with parties whose governance arrangements it reviews.

Findings are separated from any optional implementation appointment.

High-profile or contested assignments may receive external peer review.

Case studies are never published without express client permission.

Design Review Ltd separately provides design review services that are typically commissioned and funded by applicants. This interest is disclosed at appointment and has no bearing on the conduct or findings of a governance review.

Read the conflicts and independence policy →

Questions

Clear boundaries from the outset.

Design Review Ltd (company number 06512522), the company behind The Design Review Panel, is the contracting provider. Professional indemnity insurance is held and cover details are available on request. An assignment-specific conflicts check is completed before every appointment.

View all frequently asked questions

Not ready to book?

Ask one question or request a callback.

The booking pages are the fastest route. Use this form only if your procurement route, scope or timing needs a short conversation first.

No payment is taken online. A toolkit invoice or review proposal is issued only after the request has been checked.