Published scope
- One defined governance arrangement and agreed participating organisations.
- Lead reviewer plus an independent peer reviewer.
- Agreed core documents and a proportionate sample of operational records.
- Up to six confidential stakeholder evidence conversations.
- Expanded findings report with strengths, material gaps and a 90-day action plan.
- A facilitated two-hour senior workshop.
- One factual-correction round and one follow-up review 6–10 weeks later.
Indicative professional time
Scoping, conflicts and evidence plan0.5 day
Document and sample review3 days
Up to six stakeholder evidence conversations1.5 days
Synthesis and expanded findings report3 days
Independent peer review and challenge1 day
Senior workshop preparation and facilitation1 day
Follow-up review and written note0.5 day
This allocation is a planning assumption, not a time-sheeted fee. The final evidence boundary, participants, meetings, outputs and programme are confirmed in the written scope before appointment.
Peer reviewer criteria
The peer reviewer must be independent of the client, current delivery provider and evidence under review; have senior experience relevant to the arrangement; complete the same conflicts process; and be able to challenge the reasoning, evidence trail and proportionality of findings.